Cases 61 - 70 of 2,183
Benson v. Shelby Fiduciary Sale Force of Shelby County Jail
as 2:2023cv02621
Petitioner:
Rickey Benson
Respondent:
Shelby Fiduciary Sale Force of Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Benson v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2023cv02622
Petitioner:
Rickey Benson
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. Eller
as 2:2023cv02620
Petitioner:
Chris Brown and Christopher D. Brown
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Halstead v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02606
Petitioner:
Michael Halstead
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Benson v. Bonner
as 2:2023cv02584
Petitioner:
Rickey Benson
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ross v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2023cv02576
Petitioner:
Richard L Ross
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Claxton v. Pounds
as 2:2023cv02553
Petitioner:
Darryl Claxton
Respondent:
Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clinton v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02548
Petitioner:
Gregory K. Clinton
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Green v. Eller
as 1:2023cv01170
Petitioner:
Donte Green
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ibrihim v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2023cv02509
Petitioner:
Siraj Ibrihim and Robert Crain
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons and John Doe of United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
