Cases 81 - 90 of 10,934
Doss v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Harold Doss
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanier v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lanier
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00260
Petitioner:
Kedrick Ross
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Keach v. Ashly et al
as 3:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Keach
Defendant:
Ashly Taylor Martin, Stephen Taylor and Mary Beth Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindberg v. Clendenion et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
John Lindberg
Defendant:
Jason Clendenion, Josesph Gilbert, Ted Baltimore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Clifton D. Craig
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayford, Jr v. Montgomery County et al
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Larry Rayford, Jr
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Charles S. Bloodworth, Jaclyn M. Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pegues v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Pegues
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00217
Petitioner:
Darcel D. Wright
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
