District Court Cases in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 57,654
GALLO et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv01746
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER GALLO, GAVIN CLARKE and DESHAUN PROCTOR
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
LEONARD v. ARAMARK EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2024cv01747
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEONARD
Defendant:
ARAMARK EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BERTON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv01750
Plaintiff:
RONALD P. BERTON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITY HEALTH CARE INC. and THOSE UNKNOWN
KAKHABRISHVILI v. U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION
as 1:2024cv01748
Plaintiff:
ZURAB KAKHABRISHVILI
Defendant:
U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
CHISHTI v. AFINITI, INC.
as 1:2024cv01723
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD ZIAULLAH KHAN CHISHTI
Defendant:
AFINITI, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
ESTATE OF ASHLI BABBITT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01701
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF ASHLI BABBITT and AARON BABBITT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
FUNCTIONAL GOVERNMENT INITIATIVE v. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
as 1:2024cv01730
Plaintiff:
FUNCTIONAL GOVERNMENT INITIATIVE
Defendant:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
HUNTLEY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
as 1:2024cv01745
Plaintiff:
CHAD DONALD HUNTLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
ROBERTSON v. CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES (CMS)
as 1:2024cv01751
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ROBERTSON
Defendant:
CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES (CMS)
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Sheckles v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01713
Plaintiff:
Megan J Sheckles
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
