Eleventh Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 137,479
James Esseks, et alIn re: James Esseks, et al
as 24-11618
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES D. ESSEKS, CARL CHARLES, LATISHA FAULKS and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
Rechkunov v. DDS MAZAL, LLC
as 1:2024cv21928
Plaintiff:
Alexey Rechkunov
Defendant:
DDS MAZAL, LLC doing business as Bal Harbour Smiles
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Intergraph Corporation v. Price
as 5:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Intergraph Corporation doing business as Hexagon Asset Lifecycle Intelligence Divison
Defendant:
Kevin Price
ORO NEGRO PRIMUS PTE. LTD. et al v. QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP et al
as 1:2024mc21926
Petitioner:
ORO NEGRO PRIMUS PTE. LTD., ORO NEGRO LAURUS PTE. LTD., ORO NEGRO FORTIUS PTE. LTD., and others
Respondent:
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, GONZALO GIL WHITE, JOSE ANTONIO CAEDO WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Outcomes Operating, Inc. v. Fritcher
as 8:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
Outcomes Operating, Inc.
Defendant:
Tycene Fritcher
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
