District Court Cases in New Mexico
Cases 21 - 30 of 26,226
Ortega et al v. Lujan Grisham et al
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ortega and Rebecca Scott
Defendant:
Governor of NM Michelle Lujan Grisham and NM Attorney General Raul Torrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Chino v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Earl Chino
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico State Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujan v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lujan
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Probation and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lynn Manning
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucero v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lucero
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Antion M. Long, Jarred L Phillips, Shamar Singletary and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbaucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ludi v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
John J. Ludi
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jordan v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Shonna Leigh Jordan
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Chandler
as 1:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Robert Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
