Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 102,692
Fields v. Neal
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Fields
Defendant:
Jeff Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Richard Williamson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Broadnax v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Marcus Derick Broadnax
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ortiz v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ismael Ortiz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bonner v. West et al
as 5:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patrick Bonner
Defendant:
John West, Asst Dir. Greg Martin, Dir. Robert Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. USA
as 4:2024cv00451
Petitioner:
Edward Eugene Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Stevenson v. Medical Staff
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Brad Stevenson
Defendant:
Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dingle v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
Marthur L Dingle
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weber v. Daniels et al
as 6:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
David A. Weber
Defendant:
Duane Daniels, District Attorney and Judge FNU Tibby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weber v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
David A. Weber
Defendant:
Duane Daniels, District Attorney and Judge FNU Tibby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
