Tenth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 15,478
Gartman (PS) v. People of the State of Colorado, The
as 1:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Clinton Gartman
Defendant:
People of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivers (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Jerome N. Rivers
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Gagliano et al
as 1:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Jabari J Johnson
Defendant:
Stephanie Gagliano, Leon Johnson and FNU Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Youth and Family Services of Enid et al
as 5:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lee Black
Defendant:
Youth and Family Services of Enid, Melissa L Blanton, Garfield County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steele (PS) v. Stencil et al
as 1:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Brandon T. Steele
Defendant:
Andre Moses Stencil and Jared Polis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Albert Garza
Defendant:
Moses Andre Stancil, Brekke and Rasor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Vigil
as 2:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Omar L. Reed
Defendant:
Joe Vigil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lombardi v. Prosecution and Code Enforcement Office, et al
as 24-1108
Plaintiff:
KIKI LOMBARDI, a/k/a K. Kiki Whitaker-Lombard
Defendant:
PROSECUTION AND CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE, DENVER PROBATION AND CASES, DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE and others
Lombard-Jackson (PS) v. RMHS et al
as 1:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
Cal Bartis and Kiki Lombard-Jackson
Defendant:
RMHS, Amsterclam Social Services, DHS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricks v. Kelly et al
as 5:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
John Allen Ricks
Defendant:
Laura Kelly and Kris Kobach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
