District of New Mexico Cases

Cases filed

Cases 31 - 40 of 14,980
Flores v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv00404
Plaintiff: Angel Flores
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Tort Claim
Lee v. City of Gallup et al
as 1:2015cv00405
Plaintiff: Darrell H Lee
Defendant: City of Gallup , Jackie McKinney , Dan Dible and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Shive v. Amazon.com Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00406
Plaintiff: James Shive
Defendant: Amazon.com Inc., eBay, Inc., John LaVecchia and others
Cause Of Action: Copyright Infringement
Hancock v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 1:2015cv00399
Plaintiff: Grace Hancock
Defendant: Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Ward v. Hanger Prosthetics and Orthotics Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00403
Plaintiff: Sylvia R. Ward
Defendant: Hanger Prosthetics and Orthotics Inc., Brad Hornick
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Romanczuk v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2015cv00401
Plaintiff: Robert J Romanczuk
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00402
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Age)
Mendoza v. City of Carlsbad et al
as 2:2015cv00400
Plaintiff: Edward Mendoza
Defendant: City of Carlsbad, Carlsbad Police Department, Daniel F Fierro and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2015cv00397
Defendant: Unknown Persons
Plaintiff: Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: Cause Code Unknown
Balderas v. Preferred Care, Inc., et al.
as 1:2015cv00396
Plaintiff: Hector H. Balderas
Defendant: Preferred Care, Inc. , Preferred Care Partners Management Group, L.P. , PCPM GP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Fraud
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.