US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,383
Young v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Cedric Orlando Young
Defendant:
Bonner, S Mitchell, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brunson v. Green et al
as 5:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Albert Brunson
Defendant:
Green, Howell and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Richerson et al
as 2:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Marcus Antonio Horton
Defendant:
Kelly Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harshaw v. Clemson et al
as 5:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Darnell DeMarcus DeDrea Harshaw
Defendant:
C/O Clemson, C/O Charlie and C/O Jacob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brocato v. Hamm
as 7:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Ryan Anthony Brocato
Defendant:
Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodruff v. Etowah County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
William Woodruff
Defendant:
Etowah County Detention Center, Fountain, Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCaulley v. Madison County Jail Infirmary
as 5:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Joseph Scott McCaulley, SR
Defendant:
Madison County Jail Infirmary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Llovera v. Parker
as 5:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Rafael Llovera
Defendant:
Stephen Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Kendarius DeAndre Butler
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Corizon Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Elliott et al
as 7:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Milton Wright
Defendant:
Elliott, Hill, Dixie Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
