US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14,060
FREDERICK v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
JOHN HENRY FREDERICK, SR
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and LIBERTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
RANDY A HART
Defendant:
G ENGLISH and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. UNKNOWN MAKER OF ZANTAC RANITIDINE et al
as 3:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
ROY WAYNE JACKSON, JR
Defendant:
UNKNOWN MAKER OF ZANTAC RANITIDINE, CMC PHARMACY and UNIVERSITY TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CANNON v. CHASE et al
as 4:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
ANTWOINE CANNON
Defendant:
CHASE and FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHANDLER v. RALPH et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
CALVIN ANTHONY CHANDLER
Defendant:
A RALPH and C CASWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WAMBLES v. BROWN
as 3:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
JAMIE WAMBLES
Defendant:
J BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VELAZQUEZ v. WILSON
as 3:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL VELAZQUEZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INGRAM v. USA
as 3:2024cv00172
Petitioner:
KADEEM INGRAM
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PRIESTER v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRIESTER, JAMES THOMAS and DAVID JACKSON
Defendant:
SCOTT S HARRIS, GRANT MALOY, EUGENE GRINBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
