US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 14,062
HUFF v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN HUFF
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. SECY DEPT OF CORRECTIONS FACILITY SUPPORT et al
as 4:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT III
Defendant:
SECT DEPT OF CORRECTIONS FACILITY SUPPORT and JAY PAY REPRESENTATIVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AVANTS v. MANN et al
as 5:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS AVANTS
Defendant:
C MANN, B BENTON, BUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILDER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
ANTONIOUS WILDER and LARRY A DAWKINS
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HIGHSMITH v. USA
as 4:2024cv00139
Petitioner:
JIMMY LEE HIGHSMITH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GREEN v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
MONTRELL D GREEN
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. DOE
as 4:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
JAMELL M COOPER
Defendant:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOBBS v. CITY OF PANAMA CITY BEACH et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
OLANDIS DEAN HOBBS
Defendant:
CITY OF PANAMA CITY BEACH, PANAMA CITY BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
CURTIS KENNEDY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
STARKS v. USA
as 4:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
EDDIE D STARKS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
