US District Court for the Northern District of Florida

Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 429,345
BIVENS v. SZCZECINA
as 4:2024cv00185
Petitioner: JEROME E BIVENS
Respondent: M SZCZECINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOWARD v. BROTON
as 4:2024cv00187
Petitioner: KIRK H0WARD
Respondent: JENNIFER A BROTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KENON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00186
Plaintiff: CARLOS S KENON
Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CASEY v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00188
Plaintiff: BRIAN M CASEY
Defendant: RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAZILL v. COTTON et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: GEORGE BRAZILL
Defendant: COTTON, VIRGINIA LOCKEY and UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARNEY v. GEO GROUP
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff: ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant: GEO GROUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARNEY vs STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv00190
Plaintiff: ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOGANS v. EYE PARTNERS PC
as 5:2024cv00079
Plaintiff: Shelia Delores Hogans
Defendant: Eye Partners, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
REED v. BECERRA
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff: Michael W Reed MD PA
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST v. MOBLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff: Life Insurance Company of the Southwest
Defendant: Marcia Mobley, Cassia Oxendine, Sha'Ron Mobley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?