Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 77,223
Lockhart, Roderick v. State of Florida
as 0:2024cv60732
Plaintiff:
Roderick D. Lockhart
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Walleske v. Childs et al
as 8:2024cv01044
Plaintiff:
Clarence E. Walleske
Defendant:
Larry Childs, Ronterrious Williams, John Does 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Codner v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 0:2024cv60726
Plaintiff:
Elijah Shane Codner
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, Governor Ron DeSantis, Attorney General Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sindaco v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Volusia)
as 3:2024cv00429
Petitioner:
Robert E Sindaco
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cleveland v. Blizzard et al
as 6:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Lamundrick R Cleveland
Defendant:
Attorney Jason T Blizzard, Circuit Judge Kathryn D. Weston and Asst State Attorney Amie M Assent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Augustin, Jose A. v. Lin et al
as 9:2024cv80551
Plaintiff:
Jose Anderson Augustin
Defendant:
Adam Lin and Swigert Anthony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
RUMPH v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00191
Petitioner:
TAVARES RUMPH
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
