Georgia Contract Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 79
Owners Insurance Company v. Endicott Buck-Cadillac Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv00056
Defendant:
James Brooms and Endicott Buck-Cadillac Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IOU CENTRAL INC v. ACRA CONSTRUCTION LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00177
Plaintiff:
IOU CENTRAL INC
Defendant:
ROBERT J REYNOLDS, ACRA CONSTRUCTION LLC and KIMBERLY A REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. DUNWODY
as 5:2019cv00220
Plaintiff:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
Defendant:
EUGENE C DUNWODY, JR
SHAW'S MENSWEAR v. DELONGY et al
as 5:2019cv00104
Defendant:
G C OF WINTER PARK INC, H CRAIG DELONGY, JCNAPLES INC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAW'S MENSWEAR INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NICHOLS
as 7:2018cv00106
Defendant:
JUDY S NICHOLS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
United States of America v. Simmons et al
as 3:2018cv00032
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael E. Simmons and Global Consortiums, LLC
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 9
HIBERNATION THERAPUTICS USA LLC v. SMISSON et al
as 5:2018cv00052
Plaintiff:
HIBERNATION THERAPUTICS USA LLC
Defendant:
HUGH SMISSON, III and DAVID FIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMERISURE INSURANCE COMPANY v. APPLE FENCE CO INC
as 3:2018cv00005
Defendant:
APPLE FENCE CO INC
Plaintiff:
AMERISURE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority v. Whitfield et al
as 4:2017cv00248
Plaintiff:
Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority
Defendant:
Shannon Whitfield, Walker County, Georgia and Shannon Whitfield Walker County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOOZE V. MORRIS MULTIMEDIA INC.
as 5:2017cv00314
Plaintiff:
KARLISHA BOOZE
Defendant:
MORRIS MULTIMEDIA INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
