US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 687
NESMITH v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2017cv01743
Plaintiff:
ROSA NESMITH
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
SHILLER v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2017cv01679
Plaintiff:
KIM MARIE SHILLER
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
JENKINS v. NJ TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 2:2017cv01143
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE JENKINS
Defendant:
NJ TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
JONES v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION (CONRAIL)
as 2:2017cv01144
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. JONES
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION (CONRAIL)
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
FETHEROLF v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
as 5:2017cv00665
Plaintiff:
BRIAN FETHEROLF
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
WILSON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2017cv00484
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILSON
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
HARVEY v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2017cv00424
Plaintiff:
VERNON HARVEY
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
ARENTS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
ROBERT H. ARENTS
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BUTLER v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
DAVID BUTLER
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
HERLIHY v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2016cv04819
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HERLIHY
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
