US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 398
UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND v. SPORTSWEAR INC.
as 3:2016cv00167
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND
Defendant:
SPORTSWEAR INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
THE FRANKLIN INVESTMENT CORP. v. CMC STEEL FABRICATORS, INC.
as 1:2016cv00182
Plaintiff:
THE FRANKLIN INVESTMENT CORP.
Defendant:
CMC STEEL FABRICATORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
NEW PIG CORPORATION v. ULINE, INC.
as 3:2016cv00140
Plaintiff:
NEW PIG CORPORATION
Defendant:
ULINE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
EYETIQUE CORPORATION v. EYE-QUE, LLC
as 2:2016cv00716
Plaintiff:
EYETIQUE CORPORATION
Defendant:
EYE-QUE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
OMNIA ITALIAN DESIGN, INC. v. OMNIA FURNITURE GROUP LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00600
Plaintiff:
OMNIA ITALIAN DESIGN, INC.
Defendant:
OMNIA FURNITURE GROUP LLC, BARRY BREIBART, JENNIFER HARLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
FOX'S PIZZA DEN, INC. v. SEAN, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00515
Plaintiff:
FOX'S PIZZA DEN, INC.
Defendant:
SEAN, LLC, SARVAR MURATOV and SARVAR TADJIKHODJAYEV
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
SCIOINSPIRE CORP. v. VERIFOOD, LTD. et al
as 2:2016cv00240
Plaintiff:
SCIOINSPIRE CORP.
Defendant:
VERIFOOD, LTD. and CONSUMER PHYSICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
MCMAHON v. REFRESH DENTAL ALLIANCE et al
as 2:2016cv00170
Plaintiff:
SUSAN MCMAHON
Defendant:
REFRESH DENTAL ALLIANCE , PROFESSIONAL DENTAL ALLIANCE, LLC. , NORTH AMERICAN DENTAL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
MICROTECH KNIVES, INC. et al v. FLYNN
as 1:2016cv00010
Plaintiff:
MICROTECH KNIVES, INC. and MARFIONE C USTOME KNIVES, LLC,
Defendant:
TIMOTHY FLYNN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
MICROTECH KNIVES, INC. v. BROUS
as 1:2015cv00291
Plaintiff:
MICROTECH KNIVES, INC.
Defendant:
JASON BROUS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
