US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 5,386
AMERICAN GLASS MACHINERY, LLC v. OTT et al
as 1:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN GLASS MACHINERY, LLC
Defendant:
RAY OTT doing business as ARKAUM INDUSTRIES LLC and JOHN PAVALONIS doing business as ARKAUM INDUSTRIES LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McCOLLUM v. GOETTLER et al
as 2:2023cv01658
Plaintiff:
PORTIA McCOLLUM
Defendant:
MICHAEL GOETTLER, W. DON CORNWELL, ROBERT J. COURY and others
Not Classified By Court:
VIATRIS, INC.
MAHONEY v. NORDWALL
as 2:2023cv01651
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. MAHONEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL NORDWALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
L.B. FOSTER COMPANY v. BROGDEN et al
as 2:2023cv01642
Plaintiff:
L.B. FOSTER COMPANY
Defendant:
JR. BOBBY BROGDEN, KERRY MOORE and MILL MAN STEEL, INC. a Colorado headquartered corporation doing business as MAVRIK ENVIRONMENTAL & EXPLORATION PRODUCTS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
RIMSYS, INC. v. COHN
as 2:2023cv01630
Plaintiff:
RIMSYS, INC. and RIMSYS, INC
Defendant:
KAREN COHN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. TINSTMAN et al
as 2:2023cv01557
Plaintiff:
INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Defendant:
NATHAN TINSTMAN, JOSEPH ESTEP, JEREMIAH L. KEMP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
