Pennsylvania Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 7,206
DUNOH v. OZBEY et al
as 2:2024cv01340
Plaintiff:
MILDRED DUNOH
Defendant:
AYDIN OZBEY and EMIRHAN ALTUG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
FETOUH v. MINTZ
as 2:2024cv01321
Plaintiff:
FATIMA FETOUH
Defendant:
DESHONNA MINTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Wiley-Duca v. Lozak
as 5:2024cv01317
Plaintiff:
Robin Wiley-Duca
Defendant:
Erica Lozak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Polanco et al v. Blackwell
as 1:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Jaraysa Polanco, Juan A. Lopez Toribio, Jeury Polanco and others
Defendant:
Denise Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Gainer v. BORDERTOWN TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
Rosalind Gainer
Defendant:
BORDERTOWN TRANSPORTATION, INC. and Oscar Meza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
MCFADDEN v. JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01301
Plaintiff:
JULIA MCFADDEN
Defendant:
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., CHRISTOPHER G. CONNORS, JACOBS TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Bauer et al v. Runnels et al
as 1:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
John Bauer and Lori Bauer
Defendant:
Dustin J. Runnels and US Xpress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
BUERK et al v. RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
BARBARA BUERK and DANIEL BUERK
Defendant:
RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Stokes v. Herron
as 2:2024cv01283
Plaintiff:
Montriel Stokes
Defendant:
Jeffrey Herron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Brown v. Witt
as 5:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Pamela L. Brown
Defendant:
Isaac G. Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
