Pennsylvania Labor Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 12,814
PARKINSON v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01362
Plaintiff:
DONNA PARKINSON
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA doing business as UNUM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
GREENE v. TOMORROW ENERGY CORP. et al
as 2:2024cv01391
Plaintiff:
AYANNA GREENE
Defendant:
TOMORROW ENREGY CORP and JEFF IVY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
POWERS et al v. AIRGAS, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01353
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POWERS and LUIS CALLES
Defendant:
AIRGAS, INC. and AIRGAS USA, LLC
CAMPAGNINI v. COSCIA MOOS ARCHITECTURE, LLC
as 2:2024cv01344
Plaintiff:
LAUREN CAMPAGNINI
Defendant:
COSCIA MOOS ARCHITECTURE, LLC
Pratico v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 2:2024cv01326
Plaintiff:
Stephanie A Pratico
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
HERNANDEZ v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2024cv01309
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
MacDonald v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01290
Plaintiff:
Emmalee MacDonald
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA doing business as UNUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
TENNANT v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TENNANT
Defendant:
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TENNANT v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TENNANT
Defendant:
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
CRISCITO v. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.
as 2:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
FRANK CRISCITO
Defendant:
LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
