US District Court for the District of Maryland Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 88
Rodgers v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2012cv01230
Defendant:
General Motors LLC and Heritage Chevrolet-Buick, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Skye Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rathod v. Bolton
as 8:2012cv01123
Plaintiff:
Tushar Rathod
Defendant:
Roy H. Bolton, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. Kumho Tire U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2012cv00850
Plaintiff:
Kiana Smith , Lisa Johnson , Jermaine Smith and others
Defendant:
Kumho Tire U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Croslin v. Toyota Motor Sales
as 1:2012cv00468
Plaintiff:
Errence Croslin
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeffers v. The Corporate Trust Inc.
as 1:2012cv00467
Plaintiff:
Julia Jeffers
Defendant:
The Corporate Trust Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strigle v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2011cv02963
Plaintiff:
John Strigle
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Petsche et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2011cv02314
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Petsche and Carolyn J. Petsche
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company , Key Safety Systems, Inc. and Honeywell International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gottesman v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv03576
Plaintiff:
Estelle Gottesman
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. , Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing of North America, Inc. and Toyota Motor Manufacturing Kentucky, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keller et al v. Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc.
as 8:2010cv01773
Plaintiff:
Ann Keller , Kimberley Keller , Robert W. Keller and others
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jeffers v. Inaba et al
as 1:2010cv01406
Plaintiff:
Julia Jeffers
Defendant:
Yoshimi Inaba and James Lentz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
