Maryland Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 8,778
Hinton v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01212
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hinton
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrick v. Dean, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Larnell E. Hendrick
Defendant:
Robert Dean, Jr., Lieutnant Ahmed, Dr. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammock v. Shellenberger et al
as 1:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
Terrence Edward Hammock
Defendant:
Scott Shellenberger, States Attorney Michael Fuller and States Attorney Michelle Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Zeller v. Reese et al
as 1:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
David Zeller
Defendant:
Ms. Reese and YesCare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Wicomico County Detention Center
as 1:2024cv01061
Plaintiff:
Marcel D. Garrett
Defendant:
Wicomico County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Vaughey et al
as 1:2024cv01063
Plaintiff:
Phillip Hill
Defendant:
John Vaughey, Jack Truppo Burbage, John Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Ndze et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Ndze, Farinloye and Boyd Cod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. N.B.C.I. Administrative Review Team et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
Monroe Bernard Washington
Defendant:
N.B.C.I. Administrative Review Team, Wagner, Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Morant v. The Warden et al
as 1:2024cv01105
Plaintiff:
Tavis Davon Morant
Defendant:
The Warden and Officers of the Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradby v. Blankenship et al
as 1:2024cv01087
Plaintiff:
David Bradby
Defendant:
Julia Blankenship and Niles Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
