North Carolina Social Security Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 80
COLLINS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv00408
Plaintiff:
LUCKY M. COLLINS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Taylor v. Astrue DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE 7:10-CV-97-D.
as 4:2010cv00063
Plaintiff:
Ernest Northsrup Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Taylor v. Astrue
as 7:2010cv00097
Plaintiff:
Ernest Northsrup Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Kaeding vs Commissioner of Social Security Admin
as 1:2009cv00382
Plaintiff:
Irene A Kaeding
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
WADE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2009cv00705
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WADE and RICHARD WADE
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Curry v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2009cv00221
Plaintiff:
John T. Curry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Curry v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2009cv00210
Plaintiff:
John T. Curry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sawyer v. Commr. of Soc. Sec.
as 3:2008cv00476
Plaintiff:
Nancy H. Sawyer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Burton v. Astrue
as 3:2008cv00131
Plaintiff:
Angela Penland Burton
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Michael B. Mukasey and Gretchen C.F. Shappert
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sturgeon v. Astrue
as 3:2007cv00474
Plaintiff:
Rita K Sturgeon
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.