North Carolina Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,211
Miles v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Andre Miles
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Hatfield v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Roy Jack Hatfield
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Sherrill et al v. Mill Creek Residential Trust, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Onita Raynette Sherrill and Viticha L Deleon
Defendant:
Mill Creek Residential Trust, LLC, Southpark Charlotte Apartments, LP, MCRT Carolinas Construction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
MCS Burbank, LLC v. Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority et al
as 5:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
MCS Burbank, LLC
Defendant:
Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority, MERA USA, LLC, Thiane Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Nostrand v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Marlene Nostrand
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Key v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
James Franklin Key, II
Defendant:
United States of America
Riordan v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Thomas Riordan
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Colbert v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Ann Colbert
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Elliott v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Donald Brainard Elliott, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Monroe v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Charles Walter Monroe, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
