US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Contract Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 195
Precision Franchising LLC v. Ghotier, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01346
Plaintiff:
Precision Franchising LLC
Defendant:
Ghotier, LLC and Manh Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Precision Franchising LLC v. CEG, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01118
Plaintiff:
Precision Franchising LLC
Defendant:
CEG, Inc., Clarence Goodman and Shylynn Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JTH Tax Inc. v. Abreu
as 2:2016cv00191
Plaintiff:
JTH Tax Inc.
Defendant:
Ricardo J. Abreu and Ricardo J. Abreu II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Precision Franchising LLC v. Martin
as 1:2016cv00305
Plaintiff:
Precision Franchising LLC
Defendant:
Bradley Steven Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JTH Tax, Inc. v. Chandrani et al
as 2:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
JTH Tax, Inc.
Defendant:
Nazim Chandrani and Bablu Shahabuddin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jason Properties, LLC et al v. Transformu, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jason Properties, LLC and Medifast Franchise Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Transformu, LLC, Ronald M. Fields, Jr. and James Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JTH Tax, Inc. v. Hines
as 2:2015cv00558
Plaintiff:
JTH Tax, Inc.
Defendant:
Charles Hines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JTH Tax, Inc. v. D'Alto
as 2:2015cv00536
Plaintiff:
JTH Tax, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas D'Alto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Precision Franchising LLC v. Joseph Auto Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01321
Plaintiff:
Precision Franchising LLC
Defendant:
Joseph Auto Service, Inc. , Kyu Duk Chang and Nam Y. Chang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEM Investments, LLC v. Edible Arragements International, LLC
as 1:2015cv01086
Plaintiff:
SEM Investments, LLC
Defendant:
Edible Arrangements International, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Edible Arrangements International, LLC
Counter_defendant:
SEM Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
