US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,450
Marciano v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
Michael Marciano
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. Militana et al
as 2:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Anthony N. Mason
Defendant:
Dr. Mark Militana, C. Riner, C. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brock v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2024cv00298
Petitioner:
Andrew Brock, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drayton v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00795
Petitioner:
Michael Drayton
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brock v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00297
Petitioner:
Andrew Brock, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Circuit Court of the City of Suffolk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zinner v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
Edward M. Zinner
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bran v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Jose Armando Bran
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Johnson v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00303
Petitioner:
Turean T. Johnson
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00668
Petitioner:
Timothy James Thomas
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yeats v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00296
Petitioner:
Killian Yeats
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
