US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,494
Tallant v. Smith
as 1:2022cv00192
Petitioner:
John Harley Tallant
Respondent:
Brandon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Loden
as 4:2022cv00184
Petitioner:
Russell K. Hill
Respondent:
Warden C. Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lynch v. State of Mississippi
as 4:2022cv00181
Petitioner:
Leroy Lynch
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winters, Jr v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2022cv00256
Petitioner:
Clinton S. Winters, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Loden
as 4:2022cv00159
Petitioner:
Russell K. Hill
Respondent:
Warden C. Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berryman v. Cain et al
as 1:2022cv00140
Petitioner:
Brian Scott Berryman
Respondent:
Burl Cain and Mississippi Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. McClure
as 1:2022cv00129
Petitioner:
Paul Thompson
Respondent:
Superintendent Marcus McClure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. East Mississippi Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2022cv00113
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lamont Roberts
Respondent:
East Mississippi Correctional Facility and Management Training Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Carroll v. Cain
as 3:2022cv00149
Petitioner:
Wiley Zachary Carroll
Respondent:
Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Cain
as 3:2022cv00148
Petitioner:
Belmon Smith
Respondent:
Comm. Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.