US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi Labor Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 468
Reynolds v. New Albany Saw Shop and Outdoor Equipment, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
William A Reynolds
Defendant:
New Albany Saw Shop and Outdoor Equipment, LLC and Mickey Hale
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nicholson v. EmployBridge et al
as 1:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Steven Nicholson
Defendant:
EmployBridge , EmployBridge Midwest 1, Inc. , Employbridge Midwest 3, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robbins v. Flowers Foods, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
Bradley Robbins
Defendant:
Flowers Foods, Inc. and Flowers Baking Co. of Batesville, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LaBouve v. Metso Minerals Industries, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00095
Plaintiff:
Mark LaBouve
Defendant:
Metso Minerals Industries, Inc. and John Does 1, 2 and 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dorman v. Satellites Unlimited, LLC
as 4:2017cv00088
Plaintiff:
Charles Dorman
Defendant:
Satellites Unlimited, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Malone et al v. Galena Corporation
as 3:2017cv00097
Plaintiff:
Ellhue Eddie Malone and Rosie Mitchell
Defendant:
Galena Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McRaney v. The North American Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
Will McRaney
Defendant:
The North American Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dilworth v. VanLeigh RV Inc.
as 1:2017cv00054
Plaintiff:
Eric Dilworth
Defendant:
VanLeigh RV Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Small v. Panola County Board of Supervisors
as 3:2017cv00031
Plaintiff:
Victoria Small
Defendant:
Panola County Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
James v. Lazer Spot, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Guy James
Defendant:
Lazer Spot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
