Mississippi Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Cain v. Jackson Public School District
as 3:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Jsh'Nice Cain
Defendant:
Jackson Public School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Malone v. Continental Tire The Americas, LLC
as 3:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Andrew Malone
Defendant:
Continental Tire The Americas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barber v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Toya Barber
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Marcellus Wordlow and Darrell Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Priest v. Walmart Stores East, LP et al
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Nicole Priest
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, LP and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Hollins v. Wilkinson County School District et al
as 5:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Mose Hollins
Defendant:
Wilkinson County School District and Shemekia Rankin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Osborn v. Region 8 MH-MR
as 3:2023cv03141
Plaintiff:
William Osborn
Defendant:
Region 8 MH-MR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scoggins v. Account Management Services, Inc.
as 3:2023cv03135
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Scoggins
Defendant:
Account Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Truitt v. PNK Vicksburg, LLC
as 3:2023cv03103
Plaintiff:
Terence Truitt
Defendant:
PNK Vicksburg, LLC doing business as Ameristar Casino Hotel Vicksburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ogburn v. PHC-Cleveland, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Shawanda Ogburn
Defendant:
PHC-Cleveland, LLC doing business as Bolivar Medical Center and Unum Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hatten v. Laurel School District
as 2:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Avery Hatten
Defendant:
Laurel School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
