US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Contract Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 137
Select Rehabilitation, Inc. v. Holland Lake Ohana, LLC
as 2:2014cv00768
Plaintiff:
Select Rehabilitation, Inc.
Defendant:
Holland Lake Ohana, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Select Rehabilitation, Inc. v. RWS Weatherford Operator, LLC
as 2:2014cv00767
Plaintiff:
Select Rehabilitation, Inc.
Defendant:
RWS Weatherford Operator, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Yerganian v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00356
Defendant:
St. Jude Medical, Inc. and The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alishia Yerganian
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Wells v. Rupert et al
as 6:2014cv00393
Plaintiff:
Robert Wells
Defendant:
John Rupert, Brad Livingston and Bill Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Regions Bank v. Walker et al
as 9:2014cv00027
Defendant:
John Patrick Walker and Ray Leslie Morrison
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smoter v. Pfizer Consolidated Pension Plan et al
as 1:2014cv00022
Plaintiff:
John Smoter
Defendant:
Pfizer Consolidated Pension Plan, The Wyeth Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, Wyeth Retirement Plan - US and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Mount Spelman & Fingerman, P.C. v. Geotag, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00013
Defendant:
Geotag, Inc. , John W Veenstra and Elizabeth A Morgan
Plaintiff:
Mount Spelman & Fingerman, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Rohal
as 6:2013cv00902
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Scott A Rohal
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Pollock
as 4:2013cv00675
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Michael E Pollock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Warren
as 4:2013cv00676
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Renee M Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
