US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 13,968
Cappiello v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00097
Petitioner:
Chad Alan Cappiello
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Dallas County Jail
as 3:2024xc00311
Petitioner:
David Lamont Bell
Respondent:
Dallas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
White v. Director, TDCJ
as 7:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
Patrick A White, Sr
Respondent:
James V. Allred, Jr. (Prison) and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00217
Petitioner:
Dralon Duran Patterson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Lubbock County Sheriff
as 5:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Daryl Washington
Respondent:
Lubbock County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Duke v. Dallas County Jail
as 3:2024cv00261
Petitioner:
Lonnie Duke
Respondent:
Dallas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00219
Petitioner:
Joe Earl Smith
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Byers v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
Jodie Louis Byers
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzales v. Collier
as 3:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
Bobby Gonzales
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oluwaseun v. Mayokas et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Petitioner:
Shomefun Oluwaseun and John Dee
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayokas, Charles Markos, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
