US District Court for the Western District of Texas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 197
Abba Unlimited LLC et al v. Westwood (Leander) Homeowners Association, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00576
Plaintiff:
Abba Unlimited LLC and Jeffrey McBride
Defendant:
Westwood (Leander) Homeowners Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Valdez v. CHEMOIL ENERGY, INC.
as 5:2029cv05000
Defendant:
CHEMOIL ENERGY, INC.
Plaintiff:
Manuel Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Crain v. City of Selma et al
as 5:2016cv00408
Defendant:
Johnny Casias, City of Selma, Thomas Daly and others
Plaintiff:
Alton Crain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Close v. Cashways West, Inc.
as 7:2016cv00099
Defendant:
Cashways West, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James W. Close
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
FILING ERROR
as 7:2016cv00100
Defendant:
ARC CAFEUSA001, LLC
Plaintiff:
James W. Close
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Close v. ARC CAFEUSA001, LLC
as 7:2016cv00101
Defendant:
ARC CAFEUSA001, LLC
Plaintiff:
James W. Close
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Close v. Carr et al
as 7:2016cv00094
Defendant:
Antoine Abi-Habib, Eric Carr, Ash Sater and others
Plaintiff:
James W. Close
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Close v. Singh
as 7:2016cv00095
Plaintiff:
James W. Close
Defendant:
Mangat Jagjit Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Close v. Dillard's, Inc.
as 7:2016cv00088
Plaintiff:
James W. Close
Defendant:
Dillard's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Close v. JC Penney Corporation, Inc.
as 7:2016cv00089
Plaintiff:
James W. Close
Defendant:
JC Penney Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
