Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,572
Ford v. USP Big Sandy, Medical Director et al
as 7:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Samuel B. Ford
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, Medical Director, Warden, USP Big Sandy, Albert Bourla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sneed v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex et al
as 0:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Sneed
Defendant:
Little Sandy Correctional Complex, Department of Corrections, The Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wehking v. Waters et al
as 5:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
William Wehking
Defendant:
Justin A Waters, Christopher Turpin, Kelsey Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Travis v. Gilley
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Terrol Travis
Defendant:
Warden Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mahaffey v. Bureau of Prison, FMC Lexington et al
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Trontez Mahaffey
Defendant:
Bureau of Prison, FMC Lexington, City of Lexington, Warden David Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Vanwinkle v. Sgt Sizemore et al
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Donald Vanwinkle
Defendant:
Sgt Sizemore, C.O. Roberts, R.N. Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Gilley et al
as 6:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael Powell
Defendant:
J. Gilley and Constance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rodriguez v. USA
as 7:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Luis Rodriguez
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jasper Reed and Montecarlos Marteze Gant
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sneed v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex
as 0:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Sneed
Defendant:
Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
