Michigan Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 1,146
House v. Culp et al
as 2:2019cv10586
Defendant:
Lawrence Culp and General Electric Company
Plaintiff:
Michael J. House
Schwendimann et al v. Stahls', Inc.,
as 2:2019cv10525
Plaintiff:
Jodi A Schwendimann and NuCoat, Inc.
Defendant:
Stahls', Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Michigan Motor Technologies LLC v. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft
as 2:2019cv10485
Defendant:
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft
Plaintiff:
Michigan Motor Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
North Plate Semiconductor, LLC v. Omnivision Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2019cv10439
Plaintiff:
North Plate Semiconductor, LLC
Defendant:
Omnivision Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Decatur Diamond, LLC v. CDP Diamond Products, Incorporated
as 2:2019cv10386
Plaintiff:
Decatur Diamond, LLC
Defendant:
CDP Diamond Products, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BesTop, Inc. v. Webasto Thermo & Comfort North America, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10250
Defendant:
Webasto-Edscha Cabrio Mexico, S.A. de C.V., Webasto-Edscha Cabrio USA Inc. and Webasto Thermo & Comfort North America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
BesTop, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Fluid Cooling Systems, LLC v. Bovensiep
as 3:2019cv10075
Defendant:
Richard Bovensiep
Plaintiff:
Fluid Cooling Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Integrated Sensing Systems, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 2:2019cv10041
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Cardiomems, LLC and St. Jude Medical, LLC
Plaintiff:
Integrated Sensing Systems, Inc.
Integrated Sensing Systems, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 5:2019cv10040
Defendant:
Cardiomems LLC, Abbott Laboratories and St. Jude Medical, LLC
Plaintiff:
Integrated Sensing Systems, Inc.
I Pee Holding LLC v. Gloworks, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv13848
Defendant:
Gloworks, Inc. and Joseph Iacona
Plaintiff:
I Pee Holding LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
