Michigan Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 397
Powers v. Nu Life Medical Association
as 2:2022cv11429
Plaintiff:
Scott Powers
Defendant:
Nu Life Medical Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Benjamin v. Hotels Investors, Inc., D/B/A Fairfield Inn & Suites By Marriott Detroit, Farmington Hills
as 4:2022cv11303
Plaintiff:
Maurice Benjamin
Defendant:
Hotels Investors, Inc., D/B/A Fairfield Inn & Suites By Marriott Detroit, Farmington Hills and Farmington Hospitality
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Short v. Pedcor Management Corporation
as 1:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Short
Defendant:
Pedcor Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Torres v. Niles Pines Mobile Estates et al
as 1:2022cv00513
Plaintiff:
Michael Torres
Defendant:
Niles Pines Mobile Estates and Roy Farmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Lababneh v. Arbor Terrace et al
as 1:2022cv00495
Plaintiff:
Wafa Lababweh and Wafa Lababneh
Defendant:
Arbor Terrace and Big Rock Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Krieg v. Tokusen HyTech Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Scott Krieg
Defendant:
Tokusen HyTech Inc. agent of d/b/a HyTech Spring and Machine Corp., Tokusen HyTech Inc. doing business as HyTech Spring and Machine Corp. and Kimberly Arthur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dale v. McDonough
as 1:2022cv10815
Plaintiff:
Sandra Dale
Defendant:
Denis McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Allen v. Henry Ford Health System
as 2:2022cv10705
Plaintiff:
Lisa Allen
Defendant:
Henry Ford Health System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Schanz v. Otsego, City of et al
as 1:2021cv01028
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Schanz
Defendant:
Otsego, City of, Aaron Mitchell, Otsego, City Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
