Michigan Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 2,896
Whittingham v. USA
as 2:2023cv11735
Petitioner:
Richard Whittingham
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Patel v. USA
as 2:2023cv11660
Petitioner:
Babubhai Patel
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Martin v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00740
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Martin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hernandez v. USA
as 1:2023cv11605
Petitioner:
Juan Hernandez, Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Duke v. USA
as 4:2023cv11538
Petitioner:
Ronnie Edward Duke
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carson v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00657
Petitioner:
Maurice Schanta Carson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Welch v. USA
as 1:2023cv11519
Petitioner:
Koryion Deshawn Welch
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Atkins v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00652
Petitioner:
Christopher Joseph Atkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Drozdowski v. USA
as 2:2023cv11415
Petitioner:
David Randy Drozdowski
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Castano v. USA
as 2:2023cv11378
Petitioner:
Victor Carlos Castano
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
