US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Labor Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 1,769
Pack v. Global Medical Response, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Christy Pack
Defendant:
Global Medical Response, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Mulkern v. MMAD Company, LLC d/b/a Imagination Mountain et al
as 3:2022cv00269
Plaintiff:
Steven Mulkern
Defendant:
MMAD Company, LLC d/b/a Imagination Mountain, Marta Landry and Dave Landry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mulkern v. MMAD Company, LLC (JRG1)
as 2:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Steven Mulkern
Defendant:
MMAD Company, LLC doing business as Imagination Mountain, Marta Landry and Dave Landry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Henderson et al v. Palmer et al
as 3:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
Kevin Henderson and Stephanie Henderson
Defendant:
Steven Palmer, Cammie Palmer and Dara Palmer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Armstrong v. FACE Amusement Group, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Kevin Armstrong and Elizabeth Buell
Defendant:
FACE Amusement Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Barnett v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
Michael Barnett
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Ketchum et al v. ServiceMaster of Chattanooga, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
Tony Ketchum and April Ketchum
Defendant:
ServiceMaster of Chattanooga, Inc., Bobbie West and Terry West
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Teegarden v. Johnson (JRG2)
as 2:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Megan Teegarden
Defendant:
Linda Jane Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Stanley v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Cherylmaine Stanley
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and Chattem Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hyder v. Why Be Normal Pizza Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Sarah Hyder
Defendant:
Why Be Normal Pizza Inc. and Christopher Ronald Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
