US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 6,561
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
New Muslim Party v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
New Muslim Party
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burgess v. City of Pulaski/City of Pulaski Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Wayne Burgess
Defendant:
City of Pulaski/City of Pulaski Police Department, Officer Joel Robison, Officer John Dickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Welch v. United Network for Organ Sharing et al
as 3:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Dexter Welch
Defendant:
United Network for Organ Sharing and Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Nakomis Jones
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewin v. The Kroger Co.
as 3:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Tywaska Ewin
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
