US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Crabtree v. Hatch Stamping Company LLC
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Rodney Crabtree
Defendant:
Hatch Stamping Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Clark v. Restaurant Growth Services, LLC
as 3:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Jan Clark
Defendant:
Restaurant Growth Services, LLC doing business as OCharleys
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Aguirre v. Chadwell Supply Tennessee Inc.
as 3:2023cv01076
Plaintiff:
John Aguirre
Defendant:
Chadwell Supply Tennessee Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Brooks v. City of Columbia
as 1:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Roy Brooks
Defendant:
City of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Moore v. Mount Zion Baptist Church
as 3:2022cv00965
Plaintiff:
Kiara Moore
Defendant:
Mount Zion Baptist Church
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Graybeal v. Shiroki North America, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Richard Graybeal
Defendant:
Shiroki North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Brown v. Commercial Insurance Associates, LLC
as 3:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Regina Brown
Defendant:
Commercial Insurance Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Denmark v. Saint Thomas Medical Partners
as 3:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Lori Denmark
Defendant:
Saint Thomas Medical Partners
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Vargas v. Crestline Hotels and Resorts
as 3:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Michael Vargas
Defendant:
Crestline Hotels and Resorts doing business as Hampton Inn and Suites
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Whittemore v. Grand Fire Protection, LLC
as 3:2021cv00929
Plaintiff:
Christopher Whittemore
Defendant:
Grand Fire Protection, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
