Seventh Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,912
POE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
JOANN M POE
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Askia v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02172
Plaintiff:
Taiji Askia
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Vanburen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Tyler A Vanburen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hughes v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01940
Plaintiff:
Farrah E. Hughes
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Heine v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01950
Plaintiff:
Tara Heine
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Madigan v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50093
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Madigan
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Suggs v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01766
Plaintiff:
Charles Suggs
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Claywell v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01771
Plaintiff:
Walter Claywell
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Weaver v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth J Weaver
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wharton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Ann Wharton
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
