US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,107
Cotton v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv02084
Plaintiff:
James Cotton
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Felicia Atkins, Chase Wilhelm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feldpausch v. Rabdia et al
as 3:2024cv03088
Plaintiff:
Ron Feldpausch
Defendant:
. Rabdia, Wexford Medical, . Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laboy v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv04069
Plaintiff:
Hector Laboy
Defendant:
Austin Adams, Alexander Stuart, Jamar Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Gomez et al
as 1:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
Rasheem Jackson
Defendant:
. Gomez, . Tate, . Stellman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delavega v. Cox et al
as 3:2024cv03087
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Delavega
Defendant:
Ashley Cox, Frank Catino, Kathy Ashcraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Webb et al
as 1:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Smith
Defendant:
Jon Webb, Jeffrey Standard and Ryan Maride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erdmann v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Diane Renee Erdmann
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Morgan v. Edens et al
as 1:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Juhnell Morgan
Defendant:
. Edens, . Burle, Donald Doolin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anglin v. Benning et al
as 1:2024cv01145
Plaintiff:
Phillip Anglin
Defendant:
Zachary Benning and Samer Assaf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Curran et al
as 3:2024cv03085
Plaintiff:
Michael R Hendricks
Defendant:
. Curran, Heather .., Kylee .. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
