US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 9,814
Marquez v. USA
as 3:2024cv01218
Petitioner:
Oscar Marquez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Huckabee v. Shoopman et al
as 3:2024cv01219
Plaintiff:
John Huckabee
Defendant:
Richard Shoopman, Austin Zanger, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brown v. Woodside et al
as 3:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Darrion Brown
Defendant:
Lt Woodside, C/O Cook, Pinckneyville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Monti et al
as 3:2024cv01216
Plaintiff:
Jesus Hernandez
Defendant:
Daniel Monti, Christina Vineyard, Dr. Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Hancock
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annamalai v. BOP et al
as 3:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
BOP, USA, S Holem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Luedtke v. Lilliard
as 3:2024cv01197
Petitioner:
James Luedtke
Respondent:
T Lilliard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dahl v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dahl
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes and IDOC Directors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tatum v. Criaye et al
as 3:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Bobby Tatum
Defendant:
C/O Criage, Lt. Bradford, Lt Auston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
