US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 9,829
Annamalai v. BOP et al
as 3:2024cv01207
Plaintiff: Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant: BOP, USA, S Holem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Luedtke v. Lilliard
as 3:2024cv01197
Petitioner: James Luedtke
Respondent: T Lilliard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant: Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff: Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dahl v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01182
Plaintiff: Brandon Dahl
Defendant: Latoya Hughes and IDOC Directors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tatum v. Criaye et al
as 3:2024cv01183
Plaintiff: Bobby Tatum
Defendant: C/O Criage, Lt. Bradford, Lt Auston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brexton v. Shawnee Correctional Center et al
as 3:2024cv01178
Plaintiff: James Brexton
Defendant: Shawnee Correctional Center and Darren D. Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClendon v. Sankey et al
as 3:2024cv01168
Plaintiff: Duane McClendon
Defendant: Shaquille Sankey, John Doe and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Negron v. Marion Eye Center et al
as 3:2024cv01170
Plaintiff: Angel Negron
Defendant: Marion Eye Center, DeeDee Brookhart and Lori Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Niewiedzial v. Adams
as 3:2024cv01176
Plaintiff: Michael Niewiedzial
Defendant: Trisha Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Galloway
as 3:2024cv01171
Plaintiff: Terrill A Walker
Defendant: Darren Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?