Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 12,566
Lake v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2024cv50144
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Illinois Attorney General and McHenry County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savage v. McClellan
as 3:2024cv01107
Plaintiff:
James Augusta Savage
Defendant:
Ronald McClellan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Arbanal et al
as 2:2024cv02081
Plaintiff:
Otis Carr
Defendant:
. Arbanal, . Wilham, Douglas County Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Attaway v. Bracken et al
as 3:2024cv01079
Plaintiff:
Micheal Attaway
Defendant:
Brittany Bracken and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Attaway v. Doe
as 3:2024cv01081
Plaintiff:
Micheal Attaway
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. City of Chicago Police et al
as 1:2024cv02920
Plaintiff:
Cortez Foster
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police, Calvin Blunt, Jeffrey Hanssen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Alegria et al
as 1:2024cv02851
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Marquise Phelps
Defendant:
A Alegria, T Berecz and J Guevara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shah El v. DeKalb County et al
as 3:2024cv50135
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shah El
Defendant:
DeKalb County, DeKalb County Sheriff's Office, Grant Ericson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damper v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02869
Plaintiff:
Ray Timothy Damper
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Sebastien A Magiera, J.D. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Common v. Beauty Supply Owner et al
as 1:2024cv02860
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Common
Defendant:
Beauty Supply Owner and Occupant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
