Indiana Social Security Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,931
PEACHES v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
BRANDY N. PEACHES
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CAROSELLI v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
JACK CAROSELLI
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
AUSTIN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
EZRA SHERMAN HENRY AUSTIN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SELBY v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
KENNETH E. SELBY
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
MCCRARY v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
STACIE MCCRARY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Jamar K Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00530
Plaintiff:
Varner L. Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WRAY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv02283
Plaintiff:
SHARON M. WRAY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
OWENS v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
DAWN R. OWENS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CALDWELL v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
KAREN CALDWELL
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
