Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,612
Mayberry, Bobby v. Kaul, Josh
as 3:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Bobby F. Mayberry, Jr.
Respondent:
Josh Kaul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaw, Antonio v. Buesgen, Chris
as 3:2024cv00119
Petitioner:
Antonio P. Shaw, Jr.
Respondent:
Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Meisner
as 2:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
Charles Brown
Respondent:
Warden Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Recla, Adam v. Curtis, Jeremiah et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Adam Recla
Defendant:
Jeremiah Curtis, Derrick June and Adam Marciulionis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Gierach et al
as 2:2024cv00206
Petitioner:
William McKinney
Respondent:
Warden Cromwell, Greg Giese, Angela Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yefferson v. Warden FCI Oxford
as 3:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Juan Luis Yefferson
Respondent:
Warden FCI Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wingers v. Suter
as 2:2024cv00195
Petitioner:
Dean J Wingers
Respondent:
Christine Suter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardner v. DeHann
as 2:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Pierre Gardner and Pierre Douglas Gardner
Respondent:
Sue DeHann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv00180
Petitioner:
Tyrone Davis Smith
Respondent:
Steven Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Davis v. Boughton
as 2:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Demoyne Davis
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
