Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 4,202
Knight v. Wojectka
as 2:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
DeWayne D Knight
Defendant:
Dr Marieta Wojectka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris-Cook v. Tourtillott et al
as 2:2024cv00675
Defendant:
Angie Tourtillott and Coleton Wnek
Plaintiff:
Preston Harris-Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Bamke et al
as 2:2024cv00673
Defendant:
Aaron Bamke, Jane Doe and Gary Hoffman
Plaintiff:
Gregory Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Remarkiwitcz et al
as 2:2024cv00660
Defendant:
Captain Remarkiwitcz and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Jamaine Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Ronquale M Ditello Scott Jr v. Racine County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2024cv00665
Defendant:
MEnD Correctional Care PLLC, Chad Schiller, Courtney Sayer and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Ronquale M Ditello Scott Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morales v. Ross-Marinowski et al
as 2:2024cv00664
Defendant:
CO Hanson, PSU Jane Doe, Sgt Whitting and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Xavier Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ducksworth v. Eplett et al
as 2:2024cv00659
Defendant:
Sgt Dellfoss, S Feltes, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Armon Ducksworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Kempton
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Antonio B Gonzales
Defendant:
Alissa Kempton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knickerbocker v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2024cv00652
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin
Plaintiff:
Steven G Knickerbocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matlock v. Domurat et al
as 2:2024cv00656
Defendant:
Deputy Breyer and CO Domurat
Plaintiff:
Brian Matlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
