Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 4,018
Love v. Prosper et al
as 2:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Deron Darnell Love
Defendant:
Bridgette Prosper, Yanu Pusich, Warden Hepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Ball et al
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Leon Banks
Defendant:
Denita R Ball, John Does and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. McDermott et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Jennifer McDermott, Mr Weber, Ms Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Kabara et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
ArQuincy Lee Carr
Defendant:
Pollyanna Kabara, Biji Joseph, Sheriff David Zoerner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cushing
as 1:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Michael S Johnson
Defendant:
Lt Daniel Cushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. VanLanen
as 1:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Michael S Johnson
Defendant:
Jay VanLanen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cobb v. McLean et al
as 2:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Larry Darnell Cobb
Defendant:
Joseph McLean, Dmitry Chester, Nurse Katie Kropidlowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Clexton et al
as 2:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Kirk Pernell Johnson
Defendant:
Nurse Lauren Clexton, Dr Joseph McLean, Dr Chester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Sanders
as 2:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Pierre Douglas Gardner
Defendant:
Mark A Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Outagamie County Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
William Robert Chambers, V
Defendant:
Outagamie County Sheriff Office, Sheriff Clint C Kriewaldt, Mr Keisner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
