US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 11,554
Jones v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Debra Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Boeckman v. Best Express Transportation, LLC
as 4:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Patrick D Boeckman
Defendant:
Best Express Transportation, LLC
Clark v. Navvis and Company, LLC
as 4:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Detrick Clark
Defendant:
Navvis and Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dawson v. NKA Transportation, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Dawson
Defendant:
NKA Transportation, Inc. and Shirley Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jones v. DaVita Kidney Care Contracting, LLC
as 4:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Jones and Chanel Jones
Defendant:
Davita Kidney Care Contracting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stageman v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
as 4:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Russell D. Stageman
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation doing business as PHH Mortgage Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Wack v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Gerald Wack
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Timmons v. AngioDynamics, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Rosa Timmons
Defendant:
AngioDynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pippin v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Larrann Pippin
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Moore v. Pearson et al
as 4:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Moore
Defendant:
Elicia Pearson and Darren Justin Lee Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
