US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Lampley v. Hopkins
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Lampley
Defendant:
Paul Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Ellis v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ellis
Defendant:
Paul Hopkins, Kimberly Adkins, Dale Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Eudaley v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Tracie Eudaley
Defendant:
Paul Hopkins, Ryan Wells, Ashley Lepold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Patterson et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 4:2023cv01597
Plaintiff:
Bryan J. Patterson, Mary Patterson and Bryan Patterson
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, ICL Specialty Products Inc. and ICL Specialty Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
White v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Scotty Lee White
Defendant:
Paul Hopkins, Ashley Lepold, Dane R. Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Martin v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2021cv00069
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Kurt Martin
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Baker v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2020cv00231
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Stanley Baker
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0056
Pickens v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2019cv00001
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Patrick Pickens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Kosin v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2017cv02435
Plaintiff:
Charm Kosin
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Holloway v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2015cv01741
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
