Missouri Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 714
Branson v. Streeter et al
as 4:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Patrick Branson
Defendant:
Bill Streeter, Hydraulic Pictures, Matthew S. McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Really Big Coloring Books, Inc. v. Nunes et al
as 4:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Really Big Coloring Books, Inc.
Defendant:
Rachel Nunes and Planck, LLC doing business as Patch Media
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Clever Real Estate, Inc. v. Houzeo Corp. et al
as 4:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Clever Real Estate, Inc.
Defendant:
Houzeo Corp. and Amit Dhameja
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Bowers v. TRO, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Defendant:
TRO, LLC and Isaac J. Miranda
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Grover Gaming, Inc. et al v. Patel
as 4:2021cv01505
Plaintiff:
Grover Gaming, Inc. and Banilla Games, Inc.
Defendant:
Anil Patel doing business as EZ Quick Mart
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Boatman v. Bethany Building Center, Inc.
as 5:2021cv06174
Plaintiff:
Mike Boatman
Defendant:
Bethany Building Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Thomas v. Ricco
as 3:2021cv05092
Plaintiff:
Andrew "Andy" Thomas
Defendant:
Giordano Ricco
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
***CASE ABANDONED SEE 3:21-5089-CV-SW-SRB OPENED IN ERROR*** v. Thomas et al
as 3:2021cv05088
Defendant:
Mr. Andrew Thomas and Mr. George Martin
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Thomas v. Martin
as 3:2021cv05089
Plaintiff:
Mr. Andrew Thomas and Andrew Thomas
Defendant:
Mr. George Martin and George Martin
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bowers v. The Fat Plant Society, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00788
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Defendant:
The Fat Plant Society, LLC, Morten Klinte, Kasey Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
